Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G6900 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen 3 1200 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G6900 is 1622 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen 3 1200.
Advantages of Ryzen 3 1200
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 4% better in Forza Horizon 5 than Ryzen 3 1200 - 173 vs 167 FPS
- Up to 41% cheaper than Ryzen 3 1200 - $45.04 vs $76.58
- Up to 43% better value when playing Forza Horizon 5 than Ryzen 3 1200 - $0.26 vs $0.46 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 1200 doesn't have integrated graphics
Forza Horizon 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Buy for €76.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 401 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
173
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.26/FPS
100%
Price, €
€45.04
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €45.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 399 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 3 1200 | vs | Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Jul 27th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Celeron |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |