Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms the cheaper Phenom X4 9650 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Phenom X4 9650 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 5682 days newer than the cheaper Phenom X4 9650.
Advantages of Phenom X4 9650
- Up to 95% cheaper than Core i9-14900K - $17.97 vs $390.09
- Up to 94% better value when playing ARK: Survival Evolved than Core i9-14900K - $0.16 vs $2.83 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 20% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Phenom X4 9650 - 138 vs 115 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom X4 9650 - 32 vs 4 threads
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
FPS
115
83%
Value, €/FPS
€0.16/FPS
100%
Price, €
€17.97
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €17.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6907 minutes ago
Buy for €390.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6906 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Phenom X4 9650 | vs | Core i9-14900K |
---|---|---|
Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Phenom X4 | Collection | Core i9 |
Agena | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
65 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
11.5x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |