The Pentium G4620 is a clear winner – it's at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the FX-8320 and it's also a slightly better value for money, as it's only $43.22 more expensive!
Advantages of the Pentium G4620
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- A slightly better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 59% less energy – 51 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of the FX-8320
- Up to 32% cheaper – $91.91 vs $135.13
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 8 vs 4 threads
Pentium G4620 vs FX-8320 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Pentium G4620
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
173
100%
Min 1% FPS
116
100%
Price, €
€135.13
68%
Value, €/FPS
€0.78/FPS
71%
Pentium G4620 vs FX-8320 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Pentium G4620 vs FX-8320 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Pentium G4620 vs FX-8320 in core CPU performance specifications
Pentium G4620
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
3 MB
38%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
FX-8320
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
95%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Pentium G4620 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | FX-8320 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $169.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Vishera |
51 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Performance | ||
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Frequency | 3.7 GHz |
| 3 MB | L3 Cache | 8 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 2400 MHz | RAM | DDR3 |
| Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
