Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7551P outperforms Xeon X5650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7551P is 2662 days newer than Xeon X5650.
Advantages of Intel Xeon X5650
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 95 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Performs up to 19% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Xeon X5650 - 215 vs 180 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon X5650 - 64 vs 12 threads
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5650 | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
Xeon | Collection | EPYC |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Naples |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Server | Segment | Server |
6 | Cores | 32 |
12 | Threads | 64 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |