Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2630 v3 outperforms EPYC 7551P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2630 v3 is 1025 days older than EPYC 7551P.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 - 64 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3
- Performs up to 1% better in Valheim than EPYC 7551P - 195 vs 194 FPS
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 85 vs 180 Watts
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
EPYC 7551P
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Xeon E5-2630 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7551P | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Jun 29th, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| EPYC | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Naples | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Server |
32 | Cores | 8 |
64 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
| 3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 180 W | TDP | 85 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
