Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms Xeon X5550 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 3887 days newer than Xeon X5550.
Advantages of Intel Xeon X5550
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 7% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Xeon X5550 - 190 vs 178 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Xeon X5550 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon X5550 doesn't have integrated graphics
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Xeon X5550
Server/Workstation • Mar 30th, 2009
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5550 | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 30th, 2009 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
| Xeon | Collection | Athlon |
| Gainestown | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 95 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
