Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700F outperforms Xeon W3690 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-13700F is 4342 days newer than Xeon W3690.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700F
- Performs up to 33% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon W3690 - 156 vs 117 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W3690 - 24 vs 12 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Xeon W3690
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2011
Core i7-13700F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3690 | vs | Intel Core i7-13700F |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 14th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Xeon | Collection | Core i7 |
| Gulftown | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 16 |
| 12 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
