Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2667 v3 outperforms Xeon W3690 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2667 v3 is 1302 days newer than Xeon W3690.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W3690
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 130 vs 135 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3
- Performs up to 4% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Xeon W3690 - 124 vs 119 FPS
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon W3690
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2011
Xeon E5-2667 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3690 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 14th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Xeon | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Gulftown | Codename | Gainestown, Haswell-E/EP, Ivy Bridge, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Server |
| 6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 135 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
