Key Differences
In short — Xeon W-2195 outperforms Ryzen 7 3700U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon W-2195 is 495 days older than Ryzen 7 3700U.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W-2195
- Performs up to 18% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Ryzen 7 3700U - 347 vs 293 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 3700U - 36 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
- Consumes up to 89% less energy than Intel Xeon W-2195 - 15 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W-2195 doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Xeon W-2195
Server/Workstation • Aug 29th, 2017
Ryzen 7 3700U
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W-2195 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 3700U |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 29th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 6th, 2019 |
| Xeon W | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Skylake | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket FP5 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
18 | Cores | 4 |
36 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 140 W | TDP | 15 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 10 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
