Key Differences
In short — Xeon W-2195 outperforms Core i7-5600U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon W-2195 is 912 days newer than Core i7-5600U.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W-2195
- Performs up to 2% better in World of Tanks than Core i7-5600U - 529 vs 518 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-5600U - 36 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-5600U
- Consumes up to 89% less energy than Intel Xeon W-2195 - 15 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W-2195 doesn't have integrated graphics
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon W-2195
Server/Workstation • Aug 29th, 2017
Core i7-5600U
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-5600U
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Single-Core
911
71.22752150117279%
Multi-Core
1726
17.304992981752555%
Intel Xeon W-2195 | vs | Intel Core i7-5600U |
|---|---|---|
Aug 29th, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 1st, 2015 |
| Xeon W | Collection | Core i7 |
| Skylake | Codename | Broadwell |
| Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel BGA 1168 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
18 | Cores | 2 |
36 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 140 W | TDP | 15 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 5500 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
