Key Differences
In short — Xeon W-1290P outperforms EPYC 7551P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon W-1290P is 1049 days newer than EPYC 7551P.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W-1290P
- Performs up to 6% better in Baldur's Gate 3 than EPYC 7551P - 119 vs 112 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 125 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551P doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W-1290P - 64 vs 20 threads
Baldur's Gate 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon W-1290P
Mobile • May 13th, 2020
EPYC 7551P
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W-1290P | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
|---|---|---|
May 13th, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
| Xeon | Collection | EPYC |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Naples |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 10 | Cores | 32 |
| 20 | Threads | 64 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 180 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics P630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
