Key Differences
In short — Xeon Gold 6154 outperforms FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon Gold 6154 is 2099 days newer than FX-6100.
Advantages of Intel Xeon Gold 6154
- Performs up to 6% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than FX-6100 - 177 vs 167 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 36 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Consumes up to 52% less energy than Intel Xeon Gold 6154 - 95 vs 200 Watts
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Xeon Gold 6154
Server/Workstation • Jul 11th, 2017
FX-6100
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon Gold 6154 | vs | AMD FX-6100 |
|---|---|---|
Jul 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
| Xeon Gold | Collection | FX |
| Skylake | Codename | Zambezi |
| Intel Socket 3647 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
18 | Cores | 6 |
36 | Threads | 6 |
| 3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 200 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
