Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U outperforms FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U is 2735 days newer than FX-6100.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U
- Performs up to 6% better in F1 22 than FX-6100 - 265 vs 249 FPS
- Consumes up to 84% less energy than AMD FX-6100 - 15 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Mobile • Apr 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6100 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 8th, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Picasso |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket FP5 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 8 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 15 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |