Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2690 v3 outperforms FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2690 v3 is 1062 days newer than FX-6100.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3
- Performs up to 20% better in Dirt 5 than FX-6100 - 165 vs 137 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 24 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Consumes up to 30% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 - 95 vs 135 Watts
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Xeon E5-2690 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
FX-6100
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 | vs | AMD FX-6100 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | FX |
| Haswell | Codename | Zambezi |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 6 |
24 | Threads | 6 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 135 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
