Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 7600X outperforms Xeon E5-2687W v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 7600X is 2941 days newer than Xeon E5-2687W v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 7600X - 20 vs 12 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 7600X
- Performs up to 29% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E5-2687W v3 - 160 vs 124 FPS
- Consumes up to 34% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 - 105 vs 160 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
160
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1/FPS
100%
Price, €
€159.07
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €159.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 131 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 7600X |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Haswell-E/EP | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 6 |
20 | Threads | 12 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
160 W | TDP | 105 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 47.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |