Buy on Amazon
€160.63
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $2141
Availability
MSRP in USD: $2141
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $229
Availability
MSRP in USD: $229
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 7600 outperforms Xeon E5-2687W v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 7600 is 3050 days newer than Xeon E5-2687W v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 7600 - 20 vs 12 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 7600
- Performs up to 43% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Xeon E5-2687W v3 - 733 vs 512 FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 - 65 vs 160 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 5 7600
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
FPS
733
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.22/FPS
100%
Price, €
€160.63
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD Ryzen 5 7600 6-Core, 12-Thread Unlocked Desktop Processor
Buy for €160.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 127 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2687W v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Ryzen 5 7600
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 14th, 2023 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Haswell-E/EP | Codename | Raphael |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 6 |
20 | Threads | 12 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
| 160 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
| 31.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
