Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7551P outperforms Xeon E5-2680 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7551P is 1941 days newer than Xeon E5-2680.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2680
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 130 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Performs up to 6% better in Sea of Thieves than Xeon E5-2680 - 219 vs 207 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2680 - 64 vs 16 threads
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2680 | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | EPYC |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Naples |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Server | Segment | Server |
8 | Cores | 32 |
16 | Threads | 64 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |