Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7551P outperforms Xeon E5-2640 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7551P is 1025 days newer than Xeon E5-2640 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 90 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Performs up to 8% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Xeon E5-2640 v3 - 215 vs 200 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3 - 64 vs 16 threads
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3 | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | EPYC |
Haswell-E/EP, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Naples |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Server | Segment | Server |
8 | Cores | 32 |
16 | Threads | 64 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
90 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |