Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12600KF outperforms Xeon E3-1535M v5 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12600KF is 2200 days newer than Xeon E3-1535M v5.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than Intel Core i5-12600KF - 45 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-12600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12600KF
- Performs up to 12% better in Elden Ring than Xeon E3-1535M v5 - 133 vs 119 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5 - 16 vs 8 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
133
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.81/FPS
100%
Price, €
€117.67
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €117.67 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 48 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Server/Workstation • Oct 27th, 2015
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5 | vs | Intel Core i5-12600KF |
---|---|---|
Oct 27th, 2015 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
HD Graphics P530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |