Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms Xeon E3-1535M v5 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X is 2527 days newer than Xeon E3-1535M v5.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X - 45 vs 170 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
- Performs up to 27% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E3-1535M v5 - 162 vs 128 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5 - 32 vs 8 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
162
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.45/FPS
100%
Price, €
€397.35
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €397.35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 61757 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Server/Workstation • Oct 27th, 2015
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Oct 27th, 2015
Single-Core
1223
41.62695711368278%
Multi-Core
3828
19.841393251438348%
Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X |
---|---|---|
Oct 27th, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Skylake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 170 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 45.0x |
HD Graphics P530 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |