Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms Xeon E3-1280 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 3503 days newer than Xeon E3-1280 v3.
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 12% better in Overwatch 2 than Xeon E3-1280 v3 - 383 vs 342 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1280 v3 - 16 vs 8 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
383
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.12/FPS
100%
Price, €
€810.8
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €810.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 126 minutes ago
Trending Games
Using the selected game parameters
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E3-1280 v3 | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
82 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |