Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700 outperforms Xeon E3-1260L on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-13700 is 4294 days newer than Xeon E3-1260L.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1260L
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700 - 45 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700
- Performs up to 24% better in Overwatch 2 than Xeon E3-1260L - 397 vs 319 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1260L - 24 vs 8 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Xeon E3-1260L
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Core i7-13700
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1260L | vs | Intel Core i7-13700 |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 16 |
| 8 | Threads | 24 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
| Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
