Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U outperforms Xeon E3-1260L on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U is 2837 days newer than Xeon E3-1260L.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
- Performs up to 9% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Xeon E3-1260L - 98 vs 90 FPS
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1260L - 15 vs 45 Watts
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E3-1260L
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
Mobile • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1260L | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raven Ridge |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket FP5 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 45 W | TDP | 15 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
