Key Differences
In short — Xeon E-2314 outperforms Core i7-4800MQ on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E-2314 is 3054 days newer than Core i7-4800MQ.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2314
- Performs up to 4% better in Fortnite than Core i7-4800MQ - 230 vs 221 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4800MQ
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than Intel Xeon E-2314 - 47 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E-2314 - 8 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E-2314 doesn't have integrated graphics
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2021
Mobile • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E-2314 | vs | Intel Core i7-4800MQ |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Xeon E | Collection | Core i7 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket G3 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 47 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |