Key Differences
In short — Xeon E-2314 outperforms Xeon E5-2667 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E-2314 is 2557 days newer than Xeon E5-2667 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2314
- Performs up to 5% better in Fortnite than Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 230 vs 219 FPS
- Consumes up to 52% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 65 vs 135 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E-2314 - 8 vs 4 threads
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Xeon E-2314
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2021
Xeon E5-2667 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2667 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Single-Core
922
54.750593824228034%
Multi-Core
3652
86.11176609290261%
Intel Xeon E-2314 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Xeon E | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Rocket Lake | Codename | Gainestown, Haswell-E/EP, Ivy Bridge, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 135 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
