Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-6500T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-6500T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 3029 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-6500T.
Advantages of Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 21% better in Elden Ring than Core i5-6500T - 141 vs 117 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6500T - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Core i5-6500T
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i9-14900KF - $53.56 vs $338.95
- Up to 81% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i9-14900KF - $0.51 vs $2.67 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
141
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.67/FPS
19%
Price, €
€376.23
15%
FPS Winner
Buy for €376.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 197 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
117
83%
Value, €/FPS
€0.51/FPS
100%
Price, €
€59.45
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €59.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 197 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-14900KF | vs | Core i5-6500T |
---|---|---|
Oct 17th, 2023 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2015 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 35 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |