Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-6500T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-6500T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700F is 3112 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-6500T.
Advantages of Core i5-6500T
- Up to 76% cheaper than Core i7-14700F - $53.56 vs $221.72
- Up to 74% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i7-14700F - $0.38 vs $1.47 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-14700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i7-14700F
- Performs up to 8% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i5-6500T - 167 vs 155 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6500T - 28 vs 4 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
155
93%
Value, €/FPS
€0.38/FPS
100%
Price, €
€59.45
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €59.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 892 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
167
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.47/FPS
26%
Price, €
€246.11
24%
FPS Winner
Buy for €246.11 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 892 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-6500T | vs | Core i7-14700F |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 20 |
4 | Threads | 28 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |