Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms the cheaper FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 4011 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 23% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than FX-8320 - 234 vs 190 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320 - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Up to 77% cheaper than Core i9-14900KF - $74.59 vs $317.51
- Up to 71% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i9-14900KF - $0.44 vs $1.51 per FPS
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
234
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.51/FPS
29%
Price, €
€352.44
23%
FPS Winner
Buy for €352.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 72 minutes ago
Buy for €82.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-14900KF | vs | AMD FX-8320 |
---|---|---|
Oct 17th, 2023 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |