Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 5600X outperforms the cheaper FX-8320 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 5600X is 2935 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
- Performs up to 95% better in Counter-Strike 2 than FX-8320 - 460 vs 236 FPS
- Up to 40% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than FX-8320 - $0.21 vs $0.35 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Up to 15% cheaper than Ryzen 5 5600X - $74.59 vs $87.67
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
460
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.21/FPS
100%
Price, €
€97.31
85%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €97.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10 minutes ago
Buy for €82.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | vs | AMD FX-8320 |
---|---|---|
Nov 5th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | FX |
Vermeer | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |