Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 2478 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7400.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 82% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i5-7400 - 605 vs 333 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7400 - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400
- Up to 73% cheaper than Core i9-14900K - $87.02 vs $316.68
- Up to 50% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i9-14900K - $0.29 vs $0.58 per FPS
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
605
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.58/FPS
50%
Price, €
€351.52
27%
FPS Winner
Buy for €351.52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 38 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
333
55%
Value, €/FPS
€0.29/FPS
100%
Price, €
€96.59
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €96.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 41 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-14900K | vs | Intel Core i5-7400 |
---|---|---|
Oct 17th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |