Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 2192 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7400.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 27% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-7400 - 161 vs 127 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7400 - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400
- Up to 84% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - $87.02 vs $548.39
- Up to 80% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - $0.76 vs $3.78 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D - 65 vs 120 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
161
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.78/FPS
20%
Price, €
€608.71
15%
FPS Winner
Buy for €608.71 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 47 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
127
79%
Value, €/FPS
€0.76/FPS
100%
Price, €
€96.59
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €96.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 49 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D | vs | Intel Core i5-7400 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raphael | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket AM5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
5.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
120 W | TDP | 65 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
42.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Radeon Graphics | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |