Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-14900K outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 3970X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-14900K is 1422 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 3970X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 21% better in No Man's Sky than Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - 217 vs 180 FPS
- Up to 70% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - $316.68 vs $1071.2
- Up to 75% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - $1.62 vs $6.61 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-14900K - 64 vs 32 threads
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
217
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.62/FPS
100%
Price, €
€351.52
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €351.52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
180
83%
Value, €/FPS
€6.61/FPS
25%
Price, €
€1189.03
29%
Buy for €1,189.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-14900K | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X |
---|---|---|
Oct 17th, 2023 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket TRX4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 32 |
32 | Threads | 64 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 280 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |