Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 3970X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 1136 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 3970X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 13% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - 248 vs 220 FPS
- Up to 53% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - $504.51 vs $1071.2
- Up to 58% better value when playing Mass Effect: Andromeda than Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - $2.26 vs $5.4 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - 120 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D - 64 vs 32 threads
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
248
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.26/FPS
100%
Price, €
€560.01
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €560.01 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 53 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
220
89%
Value, €/FPS
€5.4/FPS
42%
Price, €
€1189.03
47%
Buy for €1,189.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 54 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Raphael | Codename | Castle Peak |
AMD Socket AM5 | Socket | AMD Socket TRX4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 32 |
32 | Threads | 64 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
5.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
120 W | TDP | 280 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
42.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Radeon Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |