Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i7-4930K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-4930K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900KF is 2986 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-4930K.
Advantages of Core i9-12900KF
- Performs up to 24% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-4930K - 212 vs 171 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Core i7-4930K - 125 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4930K - 24 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Core i7-4930K
- Up to 61% cheaper than Core i9-12900KF - $79.54 vs $206.15
- Up to 52% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-12900KF - $0.52 vs $1.08 per FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
212
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.08/FPS
48%
Price, €
€228.83
38%
FPS Winner
Buy for €228.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
171
81%
Value, €/FPS
€0.52/FPS
100%
Price, €
€88.29
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €88.29 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-12900KF | vs | Core i7-4930K |
---|---|---|
Nov 4th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge E |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 6 |
24 | Threads | 12 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 130 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |