Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G540 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G540 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900KF is 3714 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G540.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900KF
- Performs up to 36% better in Battlefield V than Celeron G540 - 279 vs 205 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G540 - 24 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G540
- Up to 94% cheaper than Core i9-12900KF - $12.11 vs $197.41
- Up to 91% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i9-12900KF - $0.07 vs $0.79 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-12900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €219.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 265 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
FPS
205
73%
Value, €/FPS
€0.07/FPS
100%
Price, €
€13.44
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €13.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 265 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-12900KF | vs | Intel Celeron G540 |
---|---|---|
Nov 4th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 4th, 2011 |
Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
Alder Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 2 |
24 | Threads | 2 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |