Buy on Amazon
€109.57
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $179
Availability
MSRP in USD: $179
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5700 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G540 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G540 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 5700 is 3865 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G540.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 5700
- Performs up to 18% better in Overwatch 2 than Celeron G540 - 372 vs 316 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G540 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G540
- Up to 88% cheaper than Ryzen 7 5700 - $12.11 vs $98.71
- Up to 86% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Ryzen 7 5700 - $0.04 vs $0.29 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 5700 doesn't have integrated graphics
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
AMD Ryzen 7 5700 8-Core, 16-Thread Desktop Processor
Buy for €109.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 266 minutes ago
Celeron G540
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
FPS
316
85%
Value, €/FPS
€0.04/FPS
100%
Price, €
€13.44
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G540 CPU Used 2-Core 2-Thread Desktop Processor 2.5 GHz 2M 65W LGA1155
Buy for €13.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 267 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Ryzen 7 5700
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
Celeron G540
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 5700 | vs | Intel Celeron G540 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Sep 4th, 2011 |
| Ryzen 7 | Collection | Celeron |
| Not Available | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| 4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
