Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7551P outperforms Core i7-880 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7551P is 2587 days newer than Core i7-880.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-880
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 95 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Performs up to 5% better in Elden Ring than Core i7-880 - 116 vs 111 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-880 - 64 vs 8 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-880 | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
---|---|---|
May 30th, 2010 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | EPYC |
Lynnfield | Codename | Naples |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
4 | Cores | 32 |
8 | Threads | 64 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 180 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |