Key Differences
In short — Core i7-7820HK outperforms Ryzen 5 1600 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-7820HK is 98 days older than Ryzen 5 1600.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7820HK
- Performs up to 9% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Ryzen 5 1600 - 348 vs 318 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 1600 - 45 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-7820HK - 12 vs 8 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i7-7820HK
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2017
Ryzen 5 1600
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-7820HK | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Summit Ridge |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 29.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
