Key Differences
In short — Core i7-7820HK outperforms Core i3-4160T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-7820HK is 897 days newer than Core i3-4160T.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7820HK
- Performs up to 5% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i3-4160T - 130 vs 124 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160T - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160T
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i7-7820HK - 35 vs 45 Watts
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-7820HK | vs | Intel Core i3-4160T |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
45 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |