Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms Core i7-2630QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 3243 days newer than Core i7-2630QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2630QM
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 7% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i7-2630QM - 190 vs 177 FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i7-2630QM - 35 vs 45 Watts
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-2630QM | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
Core i7 | Collection | Athlon |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
45 W | TDP | 35 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |