Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-13700K outperforms the more expensive Xeon E5-1660 v4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-13700K is 2290 days newer than the more expensive Xeon E5-1660 v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700K
- Performs up to 16% better in Valheim than Xeon E5-1660 v4 - 229 vs 198 FPS
- Up to 7% cheaper than Xeon E5-1660 v4 - $240.57 vs $257.64
- Up to 19% better value when playing Valheim than Xeon E5-1660 v4 - $1.17 vs $1.44 per FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1660 v4 - 125 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1660 v4 - 24 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1660 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
229
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.17/FPS
100%
Price, €
€267.03
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €267.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 42 minutes ago
Buy for €285.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 43 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-13700K | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1660 v4 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Core i7 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Broadwell |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
5.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 140 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |