Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Xeon E5-1660 v4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Xeon E5-1660 v4 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 2389 days newer than the cheaper Xeon E5-1660 v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 47% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Xeon E5-1660 v4 - 488 vs 332 FPS
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1660 v4
- Up to 61% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - $257.64 vs $658.06
- Up to 43% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i5-13400F - $0.86 vs $1.5 per FPS
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €730.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
332
68%
Value, €/FPS
€0.86/FPS
100%
Price, €
€285.98
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €285.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 68 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-13400F | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1660 v4 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Core i5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Broadwell |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 140 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |