Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms the cheaper Core i7-10700K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-10700K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 979 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-10700K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700K
- Up to 59% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - $247.54 vs $600.60
- Up to 50% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - $2.45 vs $4.94 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 21% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i7-10700K - 135 vs 112 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700K - 120 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-10700K - 32 vs 16 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
112
83%
Value, €/FPS
€2.45/FPS
100%
Price, €
€274.77
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €274.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 95 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
135
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.94/FPS
50%
Price, €
€666.67
41%
FPS Winner
Buy for €666.67 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 94 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700K | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
16 | Threads | 32 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 120 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |