Buy on Amazon
€189.83
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $196
Availability
MSRP in USD: $196
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-10700K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-10700K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 979 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-10700K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700K
- Up to 74% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - $171.02 vs $658.06
- Up to 73% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i5-13400F - $1.38 vs $5.11 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 4% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i7-10700K - 143 vs 138 FPS
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-10700K
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
138
96%
Value, €/FPS
€1.38/FPS
100%
Price, €
€189.83
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i7-10700K Desktop Processor 8 Cores up to 5.1 GHz Unlocked LGA1200 (Intel 400 Series Chipset) 125W (BX8070110700K)
Buy for €189.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 68 minutes ago
Core i5-13400F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
143
100%
Value, €/FPS
€5.11/FPS
27%
Price, €
€730.45
25%
FPS Winner
Thermaltake LCGS Quartz i460 R4 Gaming Desktop (Intel Core™ i5-13400F, 3600Mhz 16GB RGB Memory, NVIDIA GeForce® RTX 4060, 1TB NVMe M.2) S2QT-B66R-460-LCS
Buy for €730.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 67 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-10700K
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Core i5-13400F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700K | vs | Intel Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 10 |
| 16 | Threads | 16 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
| 125 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.