Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-950 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-950 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600K is 4865 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-950.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 31% better in Remnant II than Core i7-950 - 102 vs 78 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Core i7-950 - 125 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-950 - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-950 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-950
- Up to 62% cheaper than Core i5-13600K - $61.53 vs $160.92
- Up to 50% better value when playing Remnant II than Core i5-13600K - $0.88 vs $1.75 per FPS
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
102
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.75/FPS
50%
Price, €
€178.62
38%
FPS Winner
Buy for €178.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 106 minutes ago
Buy for €68.3 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 106 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-13600K | vs | Intel Core i7-950 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2009 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Bloomfield |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1366 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 130 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |