Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-13600K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-4820K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-13600K is 3313 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-4820K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 20% better in Escape From Tarkov than Core i7-4820K - 231 vs 192 FPS
- Up to 8% better value when playing Escape From Tarkov than Core i7-4820K - $0.77 vs $0.84 per FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Core i7-4820K - 125 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4820K - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-4820K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4820K
- Up to 9% cheaper than Core i5-13600K - $146.15 vs $160.92
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
231
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.77/FPS
100%
Price, €
€178.62
90%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €178.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 97 minutes ago
Buy for €162.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 96 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-13600K | vs | Intel Core i7-4820K |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge E |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 130 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |