Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 7 5700 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-4820K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 7 5700 is 3137 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-4820K.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 5700
- Performs up to 45% better in Starfield than Core i7-4820K - 68 vs 47 FPS
- Up to 32% cheaper than Core i7-4820K - $98.71 vs $146.15
- Up to 53% better value when playing Starfield than Core i7-4820K - $1.61 vs $3.45 per FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Core i7-4820K - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4820K - 16 vs 8 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
FPS
68
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.61/FPS
100%
Price, €
€109.57
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €109.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 94 minutes ago
Buy for €162.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 94 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 5700 | vs | Intel Core i7-4820K |
---|---|---|
Apr 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Not Available | Codename | Ivy Bridge E |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 130 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |