Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400H outperforms FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11400H is 3499 days newer than FX-6100.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400H
- Performs up to 86% better in Counter-Strike 2 than FX-6100 - 421 vs 226 FPS
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than AMD FX-6100 - 45 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 12 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i5-11400H
Mobile • May 11th, 2021
FX-6100
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400H | vs | AMD FX-6100 |
|---|---|---|
May 11th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
| Core i5 | Collection | FX |
| Tiger Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
| Intel BGA 1787 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 6 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
UHD Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
