Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900X3D outperforms Core i3-380M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X3D is 4453 days newer than Core i3-380M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-380M
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D - 35 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D
- Performs up to 17% better in Death Stranding than Core i3-380M - 248 vs 212 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-380M - 24 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-380M doesn't have integrated graphics
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i3-380M
Mobile • Oct 26th, 2010
Ryzen 9 7900X3D
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-380M | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Arrandale | Codename | Raphael |
| Intel Socket G1 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 12 |
| 4 | Threads | 24 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 120 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 44.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
