Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4800MQ outperforms Core i3-380M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-4800MQ is 916 days newer than Core i3-380M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-380M
- Consumes up to 26% less energy than Intel Core i7-4800MQ - 35 vs 47 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4800MQ
- Performs up to 39% better in F1 23 than Core i3-380M - 192 vs 138 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-380M - 8 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-380M doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Mobile • Oct 26th, 2010
Mobile • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-380M | vs | Intel Core i7-4800MQ |
---|---|---|
Oct 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Arrandale | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket G3 |
Mobile | Segment | Mobile |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 47 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |